Post by glsPost by MelanaigisYou demonstrated your abilities quite well by managing to alienate the AMORC
board of directors and getting yourself thrown out by unanimous vote.
It was unanimous with those attending. One director didn't attend and
two others who technically should've been there weren't permitted to
attend by the newly elected board as they would have voted in
opposition to the majority ... but can't you come up with something
better and quite a bit more interesting to try and get my goat?
=================
One of those who was not allowed to vote was the neophyte Spanish Grand
Master you appointed, who had no right to the position. You were trying to
stack the board of directors with your toadies, and didn't get away with it.
Post by glsPost by MelanaigisPost by glsYour buddy was a bit preoccupied with that notion, too ... But why are
you still obsessed over this whole amorc thing 18 years after the
fact?
---------------------
My buddy??? If you are referring to Cathari's husband, I don't know him,
never met him. He was your friend and you obviously knew him quite well. I
have no idea what your personal differences are, but to engage in a vicious
fight which had nothing to do with AMORC or this newsgroup was uncalled for.
As for your integrity, you are simply hoping to smear me by associating me
with your freind, who you viciously attacked. You had the personal
relationship with him not me.
Actually, I was referring to Cathari and not her husband. She once
wrote me a long time ago to let me know she was in communication with
you and the both of you were sharing and collaborating on research.
The reason why I called you buddies is because the two of you share
almost identical research methodologies in that you first decide what
you *want* to believe and then set about trying to prove it by only
accepting those notions which you can twist into your peculiar
interpretation. Then the both of you go about rejecting the other
notions with quite a bit of vehemence and hatred so as to convince
yourself their denial is justified. What gets interesting is when some
poor, unsuspecting person who maybe posts for the first time steps on
a sore spot in the both of your ideologies, there is a sudden tantrum
of "foul", "fraud", Crowley", etc. etc. Which is precisely what you
just did when you assumed I was talking about armand; with what you're
doing with the discussion (a rather one-sided discussion I might add)
of the word "melanaigis"; and with how you treat anyone who dares to
disagree with you on any subject.
Most of the people posting here are have an anti Lewis stance and are trying
to provoke a fight over some trivia they picked up from someone like you.
You are upset because someone counters your cynicism. As for Cathari, she is
capable of doing her own research; I gave her some information about BOTA
and Levi; that's all. I'm surprised at your viciousness towards her; she was
a devoted supporter of yours and did a lot of work for you and your group.
This reflects more on your lack of character than her research abilities.
You've proven your research is shallow and faulty by your misunderstanding
of Melanaigis.
Even when you responded to Vern way
Post by glsback when, you started off with a brief welcome and then proceeded to
tell him about all the gloom and doom to expect from those who you
know will disagree with you. Methinks you protest too much ...
There was no doom and gloom; again your projections. I was simply informing
him that most of the posts here are petty arguments about the legitimacy of
AMORC and the Lewis's. No mysticism, no occultism, just bickering.
Post by glsPost by MelanaigisBut it was I who brought up the Cult of Dionysus
Post by glsMelanaigis (you left the important part out). As I said before,
"Melanaigis" means "he of the black goat skin" and it was a cult
developed around Dionysus' appearance as a black skinned goat. I
brought it up when I asked you why you chose to identify yourself with
that name.
-------------------
Again you are proving your ignorance of the goat symbolism. You relate
everything to something sordid and can't see beyond it. Even the hoi polloi
had deeper insight into these matters.
Sigh ... You need to get off your astral barstool and clear the fog
out of your mind and start focusing on the conversation back here on
Earth. We're not talking about the universal quantifier "goat" (i.e.,
as in the class of goat), but rather with the existential quantifier
of a *specific* manifestation of a goat. Yes, we can have an
interesting discussion on the history of goat symbolism and all the
variances it entails, but that would be a distinct and separate
discussion. What *we're* talking about is the manifestation of
Dionysus in a black goat skin and what that *particular* symbolism
means and what the followers of Dionysus actually did. The name you
choose to be identified with relates to that and not the general
symbolism of the goat.
So, based upon your meanderings around the subject, can I safely
assume you chose the name because you ignorantly thought it meant
something other than it does?
I am well aware of the symbolism of the black goat; you are again showing
your ignorance of the symbols used by the ancient writers and insistent on
relating it to something sordid.
Post by glsPost by MelanaigisPost by glsYou're trying to wiggle out of this one here ... but that's nothing
new. There's a big difference between symbolism and practice. The cult
of Dionysus (not *just* the cult of Dionysus Melanaigis) was involved
in the *actual practice* of drunken orgies, brutality, and in some
instances, the killing, tearing apart and cannibalism of humans -- and
not just depicting a mythological story that has a moral in its
telling.
==================
There is more to it than a simple moral in the story. You show your
ignorance and inability to penetrate the mysteries again.
Post by glsAn essay on Voltaire; I'll file it alongside of the essay on the dark ages
and other irrelevant posts which you use to impress people with your
education.
Just curious ... if you think its irrelevant why do you bother filing
it?
I guess you don't understand sarcasm.
It's not in the having of an education, but in the ability to be
educated which is important. One needs both social skills and
communication skills which, when combined, culminate with a
reasonable ability to maintain an ongoing conversation without
changing the subject every few words, or throwing a tantrum when one's
opinion is challenged.
Everything you've posted is a tantrum because people disagree with your
opinions about the Lewis's and AMORC.
But no, it wasn't my education which entitled me to become Imperator,
but rather, my talent in understanding both Rosicrucian and mystical
tradition, initiation, and purpose; my integrity which forbids me from
compromising what I know to be right while at the same time being able
to admit when wrong and adjust accordingly; and to maintain working a
path to achieve the goal to which I have the talent to understand; and
my insight into understanding both particulars and nuances when it
comes to interpreting Rosicrucian and mystical experiences and
philosophy.
The above is all self serving bs and sophistry.
But it was I who brought up the Cult of Dionysus
Melanaigis (you left the important part out). As I said before,
"Melanaigis" means "he of the black goat skin" and it was a cult
developed around Dionysus' appearance as a black skinned goat. I
brought it up when I asked you why you chose to identify yourself with
that name. I thought you knew that. Anyway, considering your rants and
accusations against just about everyone who dares disagree with you,
god forbid to disagree with you with viable arguments, as being
involved with or influenced by the dark path, or Crowley, or being
"astrally intoxicated", etc. I was curious as to why you chose to
identify yourself with a name that gives a source to that very path
you claim to be adamantly opposed to. I still am curious, but it's
blatantly obvious you have no intention of informing us.
Dionysus Melanaigis had NOTHING to do with with "the dark path" or black
magic or any of the other nonsense you attribute to the name. You should not
criticize Cathari's research when your own research is so shallow. Those are
your ignorant projections.
Black magic is the domain of Hecate and Kirke.
My posts on black magic were few and only to show the ignorance when someone
was promoting one of the fake Rosicrucian schools as a legitimate source of
Rosicrucian knowledge. (You are the one obsessed by it and its practice.)
Mental poison was a major preoccupation of members of the Golden Dawn, and
many of the other fake Rosicrucian schools. It was a major factor in their
disintegration.
---------------------..
=================
The cult
of Dionysus (not *just* the cult of Dionysus Melanaigis) was involved
in the *actual practice* of drunken orgies, brutality, and in some
instances, the killing, tearing apart and cannibalism of humans -- and
not just depicting a mythological story that has a moral in its
telling.
==========
The myths of Dionysus are part of the Eleusinian mysteries; Rosicrucian
initiation is based on the same.
============
Post by glsAnd continue posting to this group; you prove you are ignorant of
Rosicrucians and unworthy of the imperator's title with each post.
I will continue to post to this group from time to time, yes. I have
no problem being assessed or even judged by those who read what I
write. And if they conclude I am unworthy of my title, that's ok with
me. I'm here to share ideas.
==============
You are not here to share ideas; you never post anything but attacks and
sophistries on the Lewis's. You couldn't write a coherent article on
occultism or mysticism if your life relied on it.
I've gained some insight into your admiration (and misunderstanding) for
Voltaire. Voltaire intentionally associated with Jesuits Rosicrucians and
Templars, not to find knowledge or enlightenment but in order to confound
and poison their thinking, and so to gratify his ego. His cynicism extended
to disparaging remarks about Le Comte de St. Germaine, who many believe was
the leader of the Rosicrucians. This cynicism and malice is why Voltaire was
banished from court.
Like Voltaire, the goal of your research is to create cynicism, lack of
faith. This was the sin of the Fisher King of Arthurian legends, and the
direct cause of the wasteland. It is an initiatic problem as the initiand
will not sacrifice the ego to the initiation. Instead he feeds it with the
illusion that his objective reason is superior and he rejects spiritual
insights which are demanding recognition. This also explains the differences
between our research methods. Like the original Stoics (cynics), I seek
answers and solutions. You seek contradictions and sophistries which will
feed your ego, and reinforce your malice and cynicism.
You make an excellent catch basin for those who leave AMORC disenchanted,
because they can't perform miracles in a few short months.
Keranos Melanaigis
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com